Editor's Pick: Our Selection of the Best Generative AI Tools of 2026

By 2026, generative AI tools applied to content creation will play a central role in content production strategies. Behind every blog post, newsletter, web page, or social media post, systems are now being deployed that can formulate, rephrase, structure, and adapt text to meet specific editorial objectives. Long viewed as merely a time-saving tool, editorial AI is gradually becoming a strategic asset for organizations seeking to produce more content faster while maintaining high levels of consistency and quality. According to HubSpot, 55% of marketers identify content creation as the most common use of AI in their professional practices¹.

This surge can be attributed to a profound shift in editorial expectations. Today, companies must feed a growing number of channels, meet more nuanced SEO requirements, maintain a consistent presence on social media, and personalize their messaging at scale. In this context, AI-assisted writing tools no longer simply offer quick drafts; they are integrated into comprehensive workflows covering production, rewriting, optimization, and multi-format adaptation. HubSpot also notes that 86% of marketers say they carefully proofread and edit AI-generated content to improve its accuracy, flow, and alignment with their brand messaging².

In response to these needs, a specific ecosystem of tools has emerged. Platforms like Jasper, Copy.ai, Writesonic, and Rytr promise to streamline marketing content creation, while other solutions focus on rewriting, SEO optimization, or tone adaptation. Their goal is clear: to accelerate content production, reduce repetitive tasks, and allow editorial teams to focus more on strategy, message prioritization, and narrative differentiation.

This development, however, raises several questions. Standardization of content, reliance on proprietary models, dilution of editorial voice, and the reliability of the information produced are becoming areas of concern for marketing, communications, and content teams. AI-assisted writing is no longer merely a matter of tool selection; it requires a broader reflection on the quality of information, editorial responsibility, and the role of humans in content creation.

This article presents a structured selection of the best generative AI tools for writing in 2026, categorized by their specific uses and benefits, along with a comparative analysis of their features, limitations, and the strategic implications they pose for organizations.

1. Category Overview

Generative AI tools designed for content creation comprise a suite of solutions intended to accelerate, structure, and optimize the production of textual content in increasingly demanding professional environments. Their role is no longer limited to suggesting sentences or rephrasing paragraphs. They are now involved in generating full articles, SEO optimization, creating marketing messages, adapting content for multiple channels, and tailoring tone to specific audiences. By 2026, AI-assisted writing will no longer be merely an occasional tool; it will become an integral component of editorial production workflows and digital communication strategies.

Today, the category is organized into three main functional groups.

First, platforms specializing in generating marketing and editorial content, such as Jasper, Copy.ai, and Writesonic. These solutions enable users to quickly produce content for blogs, newsletters, advertisements, and social media posts. They stand out for their ability to provide complete writing frameworks, variations in tone, and templates tailored for marketing purposes.

Second, content-writing tools and intelligent rewriting tools, such as Rytr or Simplified, which facilitate the rephrasing, stylistic editing, and linguistic adaptation of content. Their goal is to improve the clarity and flow of texts while reducing the time spent on repetitive writing tasks.

Third, performance-driven and marketing optimization solutions, such as Anyword or AdCreative.ai, which combine text generation and predictive analytics to maximize the impact of messages. These tools rely on models capable of assessing a piece of content’s conversion potential, testing different variations, and automatically adjusting the wording.

Market indicators confirm the rapid growth of this category. According to the AI Index report published by Stanford in 2025, more than 67% of companies using generative AI tools report using these technologies for the creation or optimization of textual content³. Furthermore, a Gartner study estimates that by 2027, nearly 80% of marketing content produced by companies will incorporate at least one stage of AI-assisted generation or editing⁴. Finally, HubSpot reports that the use of AI in content creation could reduce editorial production time by an average of 40% in structured marketing teams⁵.

These developments reflect a profound transformation in content production. The challenge is no longer simply to write faster, but to produce content that can adapt to search engines, social media platforms, and audience expectations. AI writing tools thus enable the scaling up of content creation while facilitating experimentation and the continuous optimization of messages.

However, this acceleration brings new challenges. The proliferation of generated content can lead to a standardization of writing style, while reliance on proprietary models raises questions about transparency and the reliability of information. AI-assisted writing thus lies at the intersection of operational efficiency, editorial quality, and informational accountability.

By 2026, the key challenge will no longer be simply to generate text with the help of artificial intelligence, but to design editorial processes capable of integrating these tools while maintaining narrative coherence, the credibility of information, and the uniqueness of brands.

2. Ranking of the Best AI Tools

The market for generative AI tools designed for content creation is now one of the most dynamic in the tech ecosystem. From marketing content generation platforms to editorial assistants integrated into editorial workflows and SEO optimization solutions, competition is heating up to offer tools capable of accelerating content production while improving its quality, consistency, and search engine performance. In a landscape where organizations must publish more content across a growing number of digital channels, these solutions are becoming strategic levers for scaling editorial creation.

Spotlight on three leaders

These three tools represent the most visible transformation in AI-enhanced content creation today. They are redefining the workflows of marketing teams, copywriters, and content creators by combining text generation, SEO optimization, and multi-channel adaptation.

Jasper (USA)

• Jasper has established itself as one of the most specialized tools for AI-powered marketing content creation. Designed from the ground up for content teams and digital marketing professionals, it allows users to generate blog posts, marketing emails, sales pages, and social media posts using pre-configured templates.
• Its main strength lies in its ability to automatically structure content according to specific marketing objectives. The tool provides complete editorial frameworks, adapts the tone to suit the target audience, and optimizes the text for various distribution formats.
• Jasper is currently used by more than 100,000 companies worldwide, particularly in the digital marketing, e-commerce, and media sectors⁶.
• The tool also includes advanced features such as brand tone control, multichannel campaign management, and integration with SEO tools like Surfer SEO, enabling content creation to align with search engine requirements.
• Jasper also stands out for its ability to collaborate with marketing teams: multiple users can work on the same project, share templates, and ensure consistency in the editorial style.
• Example of use: A digital marketing agency uses Jasper to produce SEO-optimized articles and weekly newsletters. As a result, the time spent on content creation has been reduced by nearly 50%, and the volume of published content has increased significantly.

Copy.ai (USA)

• Copy.ai has established itself as one of the most user-friendly tools for quickly generating marketing and sales copy. It features a simple interface that allows users to create slogans, product descriptions, emails, and social media posts in just a few seconds.
• The tool stands out for its wide variety of templates designed for digital marketing. Users can select specific formats, such as ad copy, video scripts, or text for email campaigns.
• By 2026, Copy.ai claims to have several million active users worldwide, with particularly strong adoption among small and medium-sized businesses and startups looking to ramp up their content production without having to hire large editorial teams.
• Copy.ai also offers an automated workflow system that allows users to generate multiple content variations from a single idea, making it easier to conduct A/B testing in marketing campaigns.
• However, the tool is still primarily designed for the rapid generation of short-form content. For longer or more complex editorial projects, it often requires a phase of human editing to ensure consistency and narrative depth.
• Example of use: A SaaS startup uses Copy.ai to generate product descriptions and promotional LinkedIn posts. As a result, marketing communications have been accelerated and posting frequency has improved.

Writesonic (USA)

• Writesonic positions itself as a comprehensive content generation platform that combines automated writing, SEO optimization, and conversational assistance. The tool enables users to create full-length blog posts, web pages, email campaigns, and advertising copy.
• One of its most popular features is its module for generating long-form articles optimized for SEO. Writesonic can structure a complete article based on a single keyword or a given topic.
• The tool also includes Chatsonic, a conversational AI capable of generating context-specific content and interacting with online information sources to improve the relevance of responses.
• Writesonic is now used by more than 5 million users worldwide, with particularly strong adoption among content creators, bloggers, and digital marketing teams⁷.
• Thanks to its built-in SEO features and multilingual capabilities, the platform is particularly well-suited for companies looking to produce content at scale for multiple markets.
• Example of use: An international marketing team uses Writesonic to generate SEO-optimized blog posts in multiple languages. The result is an increase in organic traffic and a significant reduction in content production time.

These three players illustrate the diversity of approaches in the field of AI-powered writing. Jasper prioritizes marketing strategy and brand consistency, Copy.ai stands out for its speed and affordability, while Writesonic focuses on SEO optimization and the production of long-form content. They coexist, however, with other complementary solutions, such as Rytr for fast, low-cost writing, Simplified for multi-channel content management, or Anyword for optimizing conversion-focused messages. Together, these tools form a rapidly expanding ecosystem where text production is gradually becoming a hybrid process, blending human creativity with algorithmic power.

3. How do I choose?

Given the abundance of generative AI tools designed for content creation, choosing the right solution requires striking a balance between usability, cost, data security, writing performance, and editorial consistency. By 2026, organizations and content creators alike will adopt a more strategic approach, favoring tools capable of accelerating text production without compromising quality, the reliability of information, or the uniqueness of their editorial voice.

Ergonomics and integration into workflows

The effectiveness of an AI writing tool depends largely on its ability to integrate into existing work environments.

According to an IDC study published in 2025, 72% of marketing professionals report using AI integrated into their everyday tools (CMS, CRM, content platforms) more frequently than a standalone application⁸.

• Jasper integrates directly with marketing automation environments and SEO tools, allowing teams to create content without leaving their work platforms.
  • Writesonic offers an interface that combines text generation, SEO optimization, and a conversational assistant, making it easier to create long-form articles and web pages.
  • Copy.ai focuses on ease of use: its minimalist interface allows users to quickly generate marketing copy without the need for complex setup.

Data Security and Privacy

Data security is becoming an increasingly critical factor for companies that use AI-powered writing tools.

According to Gartner (2025), 56% of IT managers consider data privacy to be the main barrier to the adoption of generative AI solutions in business environments⁹.

• Professional solutions like Jasper offer secure environments with access control and team management.
  • Free or freemium tools may pose greater risks if the data entered in the prompts is reused to train the models.
  • In Europe, the gradual implementation of the AI Act is strengthening transparency requirements regarding content generated by artificial intelligence.

Cost and accessibility

Cost remains a key factor in choosing an AI-powered writing tool.

According to Deloitte (2025), the average price of a subscription to a content generation platform ranges from €20 to €60 per month, depending on the features and the volume of text generated¹⁰.

• Copy.ai and Rytr offer freemium plans designed for freelancers and small marketing teams.
  • Writesonic offers scalable plans that allow you to gradually increase the volume of content generated.
  • Jasper is geared more toward structured organizations, offering advanced editorial management and collaboration features.

Writing quality and contextual relevance

The quality of an AI writing tool depends not only on how quickly it generates content, but above all on its ability to understand the editorial context.

A McKinsey study (2025) indicates that 74% of users of AI writing tools report saving more than an hour of work per day by automating content creation¹¹.

• Jasper stands out for its ability to tailor the tone and structure of a text to meet marketing objectives.
  • Writesonic stands out for its built-in SEO optimization features, which make it easy to create content optimized for search engines.
  • Copy.ai excels at quickly generating short-form content such as slogans, emails, and product descriptions.

Ethics, Transparency, and Editorial Responsibility

The use of AI in journalism also raises questions regarding transparency and editorial accountability.

According to the Harvard Business Review (2025), 61% of content managers believe that AI could lead to excessive standardization of writing styles if used without human oversight¹².

• The European Commission is working to implement transparency standards for AI-generated content as part of the AI Act.
  • Some platforms are beginning to incorporate traceability mechanisms that allow them to identify content generated by artificial intelligence.
  • Many companies are now implementing a policy of having human reviewers check user-generated content before it is published.

Recommendations by user profile

• Students and content creators
  • Rytr is an affordable solution for writing short articles, summaries, or simple content.
  • Writesonic lets you quickly generate well-structured blog posts that are optimized for the web.
• Freelancers and web writers
  • Jasper makes it easier to produce marketing content that aligns with a defined editorial direction.
  • Copy.ai speeds up the process of writing marketing emails, sales pages, and social media posts.
• SMEs and marketing teams
  • Writesonic offers a good balance between content generation, SEO optimization, and multi-channel production.
  • Simplified lets you manage both content creation and its distribution on social media.
• Large companies and marketing departments
  • Jasper stands out for its capabilities in collaborative management, brand tone control, and large-scale content production.
  • Anyword is designed for performance marketing teams, thanks to its predictive analytics and message optimization features.

The choice of an AI-powered writing tool therefore does not depend solely on its technological capabilities. It depends above all on how well the tool integrates into existing editorial processes and on the teams’ ability to combine automation with human oversight. By 2026, the value of these tools will lie less in their ability to write in place of humans than in their capacity to enhance writers’ efficiency and structure more effective editorial workflows.

4. Ethical Issues

The rapid adoption of generative AI tools in journalism raises significant ethical issues at the intersection of information quality, editorial responsibility, and digital content governance. While these technologies can significantly speed up text production, they also blur the line between editorial assistance and the automation of thought. Organizations must now balance editorial efficiency, content reliability, and transparency toward readers.

• Cognitive Dependency and Loss of Editorial Autonomy: Writing assistants such as Jasper, Copy.ai, or Writesonic simplify content creation, but they can also encourage an overreliance on these tools for intellectual work. When writers systematically rely on AI-generated suggestions, there is a risk that the effort required to analyze, synthesize, and structure ideas will diminish. According to a study published by Harvard Business Review in 2025, 58% of content professionals admit to using AI to generate a first draft of a text before adapting it, which can gradually transform the relationship between the author and their writing work¹³. In the long term, this reliance could weaken certain key skills such as narrative creativity or critical thinking.
• Spread of inaccurate or approximate information: Language models generate content based on statistical probabilities derived from vast datasets. As a result, they can produce information that is plausible but incorrect—a phenomenon often referred to as “hallucination.” In the publishing industry, this limitation poses a major credibility challenge. A study by the Stanford Human-Centered AI Institute indicates that nearly 27% of texts generated by certain models contain at least one factual inaccuracy when the content is not verified by a human¹⁴. Editorial oversight therefore becomes an essential step in ensuring the reliability of published information.
• Standardization of writing style: AI writing tools are trained on billions of documents from a variety of sources. While this wealth of data promotes linguistic fluency, it can also lead to a homogenization of writing styles. Generated texts often tend to adopt a similar structure and tone, which can diminish the distinctiveness of brands or authors. According to an analysis by MIT Technology Review published in 2025, several newsrooms are already observing a gradual homogenization of marketing and editorial content produced with the help of AI¹⁵. The challenge, therefore, is to preserve a distinctive narrative identity despite the increasing automation of text production.
• Intellectual Property and Copyright: The issue of intellectual property is another major concern. AI models are trained on vast amounts of text drawn from articles, books, and web pages. This reality raises questions about the origin of the generated content and the rights associated with AI-assisted creations. Several jurisdictions, notably in the United States and Europe, are currently working to clarify the legal status of content generated by artificial intelligence and the liability of users who publish it.
• Transparency and traceability of AI-generated content: Finally, transparency is becoming a central issue in the digital information ecosystem. Readers and platforms are increasingly questioning the origin of the content they view. The European AI Act thus provides for the gradual introduction of transparency requirements for AI-generated content, to enable users to clearly identify texts produced with the help of automated systems¹⁶. Some companies are already beginning to implement internal policies requiring that all AI-generated content undergo human validation before publication.
• Toward Enhanced and Responsible Editorial Work: Generative writing tools should not be viewed as substitutes for editors, but rather as supportive tools capable of streamlining certain stages of the editorial process. Their responsible integration requires the establishment of clear rules: systematic human verification, transparency regarding the use of AI, respect for copyright, and the preservation of editorial uniqueness. By 2026, the challenge will no longer be merely to produce content more quickly, but to ensure that artificial intelligence enhances the quality and credibility of information rather than undermining them.

The future of AI-assisted writing depends on striking a balance between technological power and editorial responsibility. Text-generation tools offer significant gains in speed and productivity, but their use must be guided by clear governance that ensures fact-checking, respect for copyright, and transparency regarding the content produced. The challenge, therefore, is not merely to produce more content using AI, but to preserve reliable information, a strong editorial identity, and human accountability at the heart of content creation.

5. Practical use cases

In 2026, generative AI tools designed for content creation are transforming content production methods in an environment marked by the explosion of digital channels and the acceleration of publication cycles. They are no longer limited to offering stylistic suggestions or grammatical corrections; they are redefining how textual content is conceived, structured, and distributed on a large scale. By combining automated text generation, SEO optimization, and multi-channel distribution, these tools provide a strategic lever for balancing editorial creativity, marketing performance, and operational efficiency. Their adoption is now spreading across numerous sectors, from digital marketing to media, education, and corporate communications.

Companies and major brands

• According to the Boston Consulting Group (2025), nearly 68% of large international companies use at least one generative AI tool to speed up the production of marketing and editorial content.
• Example: An international technology company uses Jasper to generate blog posts, newsletters, and marketing campaign content. As a result, the time spent on content creation has been reduced by 35%, and the volume of published content has increased.
• Jasper is widely used to structure SEO-optimized articles and ensure a consistent editorial voice across international markets.

SMEs, startups, and marketing teams

• A Deloitte Digital study (2025) indicates that 63% of small and medium-sized businesses now use AI-powered writing tools to reduce content production costs and maintain a consistent presence on digital platforms.
• Example: A SaaS startup uses Copy.ai to generate product descriptions, newsletters, and LinkedIn posts. As a result, the company has increased its posting frequency and improved its visibility on professional networks.
• Writesonic is used to generate SEO-optimized blog posts and web pages.
• Rytr makes it easy to quickly write short pieces of content, such as social media posts or marketing emails.

Media outlets, content creators, and freelance writers

• According to a survey by IndieTech Survey (2025), 71% of content creators say they use an AI writing tool at least once a week to speed up their writing process.
• Example: A freelance writer uses Writesonic and Rytr to generate article drafts and quickly structure their content. As a result, they save time during the initial writing phase and can focus more on analyzing and tailoring the text.
• Copy.ai is used to generate marketing taglines and headlines optimized for social media.

E-commerce and Digital Marketing

• According to McKinsey (2025), e-commerce companies that use AI-powered writing tools for their product descriptions and marketing campaigns see an average 18% increase in conversion rates
• Example: An online cosmetics brand uses Jasper and Copy.ai to generate product descriptions and email campaigns. As a result, customer engagement has improved and the time required to create marketing content has been reduced. Writesonic is used to produce SEO articles designed to drive organic traffic to online stores.

Public institutions, education, and institutional communications

• The Capgemini Research Institute (2025) reports that nearly 37% of public institutions are experimenting with AI-powered writing tools to improve document production and communication with citizens.
• Example: A university uses Rytr to generate educational content and summaries of administrative documents. As a result, the production of educational materials has been streamlined and information has become more accessible.
• Jasper is used to draft corporate newsletters and internal communications.

Generative AI tools used in content creation no longer merely speed up the writing process. They are profoundly transforming editorial strategies by introducing a more iterative, data-driven, and performance-oriented approach. The challenge for organizations now is to integrate these technologies responsibly, while maintaining the quality of information, the uniqueness of writing styles, and the credibility of published content.

6. Advantages and limitations: what users are saying

Feedback on generative AI tools used for content creation in 2026 indicates widespread adoption, driven by productivity gains, the automation of writing tasks, and increased accessibility to content creation. Users particularly highlight these tools’ ability to quickly generate coherent articles, product descriptions, or marketing content, while facilitating SEO optimization and multichannel production. However, they also express certain reservations regarding stylistic standardization, reliance on language models, and the risk of losing editorial uniqueness. According to Statista (2025), 79% of digital marketing professionals believe that AI writing tools improve content production speed, but 43% consider that the generated texts still require thorough human review to ensure their originality and strategic relevance.

Jasper (USA)

HIX AI (USA)

Jenny AI (USA)

An analysis of user feedback shows that AI writing tools have reached a significant level of operational maturity, particularly for producing marketing content, writing articles, and automating repetitive editorial tasks. Jasper leads in marketing applications and editorial consistency, HIX AI stands out for its versatility and wide range of features, while Jenny AI specializes in academic and structured writing. However, users still highlight limitations related to stylistic originality, fact-checking, and reliance on proprietary models. By 2026, AI-powered writing is widely perceived as a powerful accelerator of editorial work, but not as a substitute for human expertise. The true value lies in editors’ ability to guide, correct, and contextualize the generated content in order to preserve the quality, credibility, and uniqueness of the resulting texts.

7. Toward augmented journalism or algorithmic dependence?

By 2026, generative AI tools applied to writing had profoundly shifted the balance between editorial creation, content production, and communication strategy. Professional writing no longer relies solely on linguistic expertise or lengthy writing cycles; it now draws on systems capable of instantly generating articles, product descriptions, scripts, or marketing content tailored to each distribution channel. Platforms such as Jasper, HIX AI, and Jenny AI now enable organizations to produce and optimize large volumes of original content. According to WARC (2025), companies integrating generative AI into their editorial strategies see an average 28% increase in content productivity and a significant reduction in the time required to publish campaigns or articles. This shift marks the transition from traditional, manual writing to data-driven writing, where content creation becomes faster, more measurable, and more iterative.

However, this acceleration comes with a growing risk of algorithmic dependence. As tools offer optimized article structures, stylistic suggestions, and publish-ready text, editorial teams may be tempted to prioritize immediate efficiency at the expense of analytical depth and narrative uniqueness. A Harvard Business Review study (2025) indicates that 45% of editorial managers believe that the intensive use of AI writing tools tends to homogenize content style, particularly in the digital marketing and online journalism sectors. The risk lies not in the technology itself, but in the implicit delegation of part of the editorial decision-making process to models whose logic prioritizes fluidity, statistical consistency, and the reproducibility of formats.

The future of journalism will therefore depend on organizations’ ability to strike a balance between artificial intelligence and human editorial judgment. The most relevant content is not that generated entirely by algorithms, but rather content in which AI enhances editors’ ability to explore ideas, structure arguments, and experiment with different narrative approaches. The editor retains a central role in defining editorial direction, verifying information, and interpreting context, while AI acts as a production accelerator and a tool to assist in structuring the text. This hybridization shifts the focus of editorial value toward the ability to analyze, contextualize, and make sense of information rather than solely on the physical production of the text.

The challenge in the coming years will be to maintain a sustainable balance between performance, originality, and the credibility of information. In an increasingly automated editorial environment, differentiation will no longer stem solely from the ability to produce content quickly, but from the capacity to generate relevant, contextualized, and reliable analysis. The rapid evolution of generative writing tools is also prompting a rethinking of training for communication and journalism professionals. Future writers will need to learn to co-author with AI, understand its linguistic biases, master its limitations, and ensure that content production remains a space for critical thinking and creativity.

By 2027, these tools are expected to reach a new milestone. AI-powered writing platforms will evolve into systems capable of more finely understanding editorial guidelines, narrative intentions, and the cultural contexts in which content is produced. AI will no longer be content with simply generating text; it will help build dynamic editorial strategies capable of adapting content based on audiences, formats, and user feedback. This prospect paves the way for truly augmented journalism, where creativity and human judgment will remain essential for guiding the creation of meaning, defining editorial priorities, and ensuring that technology remains a tool in the service of knowledge and communication.

The next article in the series Generative AI Tools 2026 will focus on the Meetings category. It will examine how artificial intelligence tools are transforming the management of business meetings by automating transcription, summarizing discussions, and tracking decisions, with the aim of improving collaboration, team productivity, and the traceability of discussions within organizations.

References

1. HubSpot. (2025). AI in content marketing: How creators and marketers are using AI to create better content.
https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/ai-in-content-marketing

2. HubSpot. (2025). How Marketers Are Navigating Content Creation with AI.
https://www.hubspot.com/startups/ai-insights-for-marketers

3. Stanford University. (2025). AI Index Report 2025.
https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/

4. Gartner. (2025). The Future of Content Marketing with Generative AI.
https://www.gartner.com

5. HubSpot. (2025). State of AI in Marketing Report.
https://www.hubspot.com/ai-marketing-report

6. Jasper AI. (2025). Company Overview and Usage Statistics.
https://www.jasper.ai

7. Writesonic. (2025). Platform statistics and global usage.
https://writesonic.com

8. IDC. (2025). AI Integration in Marketing Workflows.
https://www.idc.com

9. Gartner. (2025). Generative AI Adoption and Data Governance.
https://www.gartner.com

10. Deloitte. (2025). AI Tools Pricing and Adoption Report.
https://www.deloitte.com

11. McKinsey. (2025). The economic impact of generative AI in marketing and content production.
https://www.mckinsey.com

12. Harvard Business Review. (2025). Generative AI and the Future of Content Creation.
https://hbr.org

13. Harvard Business Review. (2025). How Generative AI Is Changing Content Creation.
https://hbr.org

14. Stanford Human-Centered AI Institute. (2025). AI Index Report.
https://aiindex.stanford.edu

15. MIT Technology Review. (2025). The impact of generative AI on journalism and marketing content.
https://www.technologyreview.com

16. European Commission. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Act: Transparency Requirements for Generative AI.
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu